Support for small businesses

Locked down, socially-distanced greetings to all Forest Gaters, and other readers. I won’t attempt to give any thoughts on this strange, concerning, and unprecedented time, other than to hope that you are all keeping well, and safe, and the same for your family and loved ones.

I wanted to post to flag some work that we are doing at Newham to try to support our small businesses. You might remember that part of our election pledge was to work on Community Wealth Building, and you can read more about what that means online here:

The Council’s business support team are working to support Newham businesses as best they can, and have sent out a newsletter to all those businesses that they have the contact details of. We haven’t done much concerted work with businesses in the past, on a corporate level, so I’m blogging today specifically about this newsletter as I’m sure that there will be some businesses who haven’t received it.

If you are a small business in Forest Gate North (or indeed beyond) you can download the newsletter below, and please email to be added to the distribution list.

As residents there are other things we can do which can help our businesses too. Those businesses that remain open selling food and necessities need our support more than ever.

We can also help to support those who are closed. Tracks have set up a Patreon for customers who want to pledge to support them whilst they are closed, and Number 8 have similar  (full disclosure – I set up Number 8’s patreon for them, but did this in my personal capacity as enthusiastic customer and recent supplier to the shop. All proceeds go to Andie and Jeff, not to me.)

If you know of any other businesses that have facilities for us to support them, then please let me know and I’m very happy to help publicise them.

Obviously times are hard, many people have lost their jobs, lost incomes, or lost security about future income, and we’re all very aware that not everyone can pledge money right now. If you’re not able to help financially, you can help by sharing the links to local shops on social media, and by encouraging your friends and family to help too.

I am still doing my Council work remotely, but it may be slightly harder to get hold of me than usual, as I’m fitting in my work in between helping to ‘home educate’ three girls! If you need me, please email me and I will get back to you as soon as I’m able.

Download the first businesses newsletter

Stay safe and keep well.


Posted in Uncategorized

Why I’m glad to pay money for my parking permit

If you read this blog then you’re probably reasonably active online, and so you’ve probably already seen some discussion about the proposal that Newham should charge for residential parking permits. Apologies for the click-baity title, but I wanted to use this post to have my say: no one wants to pay more for anything, and I’m certainly not delighted by the difficult conversations and decisions that we will need to have and take over the next few months. But overall I do firmly believe that charging for parking permits is the responsible, moral, environmental, socially conscious and just thing to do, and I wanted to take a moment to ‘set out my stall’ as it were, and to go through some of the issues in a little more detail than, say, twitter, will sometimes allow.


Administering parking permits costs money. We are moving to paperless permits (finally!) as part of the proposed changes, and this will help and will make the whole process faster and easier for residents. But maintaining the IT system, updating it, dealing with queries, updating the database, designing legally compliant bays, painting lines on the road, reviewing the restrictions, consulting on changes, this all takes officer time and money. And the bottom line is that without parking restrictions, the whole borough basically becomes a commuter car park for Essex and beyond.

I remember just before our RPZ came into force in Forest Gate North, my then colleague Ellie Robinson followed some intelligence about some cars for sale on roads including Capel Rd, Lorne Rd and Latimer Rd. Some investigation revealed an extraordinary number of cars, all parked up for days and weeks at at time, from a dealership outside London that was changing location. It had a gap between sites, had looked at whereabouts was well-located and with unrestricted parking, and moved all of their stock, entirely legally, onto our streets. I remember a resident reporting watching someone parking up outside her house, getting out their Brompton bike, and cycling off on it to the station. I remember someone telling me we were the only station between Southend and Liverpool Street with free parking on the roads. I remember watching when the RPZ came into force in Forest Gate South, in the conservation area, and seeing all the trades vehicles, lorries, vans, and second cars that people didn’t want to get permits for (or which they had sneakily insured in places with cheaper postcodes, and so COULDN’T get permits for!) moving from those roads up onto my road. Without borough-wide restrictions we were really just shifting vehicles from place to place, which wasn’t fair or sustainable.

So if we accept, as I do evidently, that we need to restrict parking in order that we as residents can use our road-space, then it is obvious that doing so costs money, and the question then is who pays for this.

Currently around half of Newham households do not have access to a car, so as things stand those people who do not have cars are subsidising those who do. As a council we apply all kinds of subsidies in various ways and places. We, the residents, collectively subsidise the council tax of people on the lowest incomes via Council Tax benefit. We subsidise the cost of feeding families through our free school meals programme, for example. A subsidy from people with no cars, applied to those who have vehicles, is not one that I feel comfortable with or think is right, whereas applying the costs of parking to those who have cars, and applying a greater cost to more polluting vehicles seems much more sensible to me.

Social justice

It’s common and usual to worry about the impact of new charges on people with low incomes. We wouldn’t be doing our jobs properly if we weren’t concerned about this. Any new charges will be imperfect (the structure of Council tax is infamously imperfect and rests proportionately much more heavily on the poor than others) and I do see the argument that some people on lower incomes will have older more polluting vehicles.

But overall, running a car costs a lot of money. As above, around half of all households in Newham don’t have a car. Some of those residents will live in the increasing number of ‘car free’ developments where they cannot get a parking permit as the result of a condition of their planning permission. Some of those residents will be people who have chosen not to have a car, as I hope more people will decide in future. But overall, the statistics on car ownership show that it declines rapidly with income level. Our very poorest residents do not own cars. In fact, our poorest residents are much more likely to live in places with the very worst air quality which is partly attributable to car journeys, and to suffer from the ill effects and ill health that goes with that.

Of course there will be individual people with individual cars and stories and situations. But as they say, the plural of anecdote is not data. For a quick introduction to some of the evidence on this, read this twitter thread:

If you’re really interested in finding out more about active travel and social justice, have a look at the brilliant work Dr Rachel Aldred is doing on active travel, or look up some of the articles our wonderful local resident Laura Laker is writing.

It’s very normal to charge

One of the very first lessons I learnt as a councillor was how emotional people feel about parking. This continues to be true, and continues to be very striking! The ‘first residential permit free‘ was a big pledge from the old administration, and one that lots of people feel strongly about, and I can understand why.

But actually, it is very very normal to charge for residential parking permits. If we look across London, Newham and Hillingdon are the only boroughs who do not charge for the first permit. We are outliers in this respect. The free permit is an anomaly. Cyclists who use a space in a bike hangar, where six bicycles can fit instead of one car, must not only wait for the results of a consultation to see whether there is opposition from their neighbours, but must then pay £36 for the privilege of using a mode of transport that improves their health and causes zero emissions. This isn’t right.

(Incidentally, I have been lobbying for more cycle storage, as I know myself how much demand there is, especially in Forest Gate. I will keep on with this, and will keep arguing for the bicycle hangars that I know many of you are requesting and waiting for.)

Some of you may have found, like me, that when you speak to colleagues and friends from other London boroughs, their reaction ranges from surprise to disbelief when you tell them that the first residential parking permit in Newham is free. Some people I speak to literally cannot believe it. “What, nothing?! Free? For everyone? Why? How come?”

Public space

It is only through becoming involved with groups like Living Streets, who campaign for pedestrians, and also through an increasing interest in better public spaces in my councillor work and my role on the Strategic Development, that I have started to think in a more and more political way about our roads and pavements. Roads, especially in dense urban areas, are our largest public spaces. The area of London given over to parking vehicles is the equivalent size of the borough of Southwark.

Roads belong to all of us, are maintained by all of us, but have historically been designed around the needs of cars, with all other users squeezed in where space and traffic will permit. Modern transport planning recognises that you have to do things differently, and does attempt to address that. The London Mayor’s Transport strategy sets really ambitious targets for encouraging people to walk, to use public transport, and to cycle whenever they can. But the changes we’ve made and are making are incredibly modest and marginal, and in the face of enormous opposition.

There is no other public space that any of us expect to be able to store our property on. I would never think that I could store any item from my house on the road, except our family car. Of course I am not saying that roadside parking should stop. In Newham most houses don’t have space for off-street parking (and even if they do, we almost never grant additional dropped kerbs for access, as doing so damages the pavement, increases the amount of paving in front gardens which contributes to flooding, and also removes parking spaces from the street). But parking outside one’s house is, I would say, a privilege and not a right. Whenever I park my car in a bay on the road, I am using space that is ours, not mine.

Air quality

London’s air quality is an increasingly high political priority, and increasingly a cause for concern. I like to think I’ve always been worried about it, but have to admit my concern has got a little more personal focus since having a little girl who has suffered from breathing problems, since she was tiny. Last year I was very unwell with bronchitis, and developed a wheeze myself, and found myself dependent on an inhaler for the first time – an unpleasant reminder of how breathing difficulties can affect us all, and how much of an impact it can make on every day life.

I won’t go into the air quality arguments here as I know that the facts about Newham’s horrendous asthma rate in children, our rates of pollution, the early deaths that occur every year, the impact on the developing lungs of children… I feel like all these things are pretty well known. I see and of course agree with the arguments that some of the really significant contributors to poor air quality like the airport and Silvertown tunnel, won’t be affected by charges on residents’ cars. But these factors also do not mean that we should do nothing. Having other contributors to pollution in the borough is a reason for more local action, not less.

I also certainly don’t claim that emissions-based charges for parking permits will on their own tackle and improve our air quality. But this is a really vital piece of the puzzle. Alongside stricter planning requirements, alongside healthy school streets closures, alongside reducing short car journeys, alongside opposing the Silvertown tunnel, alongside increasing provision for cycling, and making streets safer for pedestrians, alongside tree planting and greening, green walls and screens, we also need to apply charges that are higher to the most polluting vehicles. Doing this is difficult, but it’s also right and fair.


I mentioned unnecessary car journeys above. No one can have failed to notice the extreme weather we’ve had recently: the weirdly mild winter, the increasingly scorching summers, the storms. It’s hard not to conclude that these are all evidence of climate change having an impact faster and more strongly than we anticipated before. We have declared a climate emergency in Newham, as have many other boroughs. I’ve said to my colleagues in meetings now twice, and I will say it again (lucky them): declaring the emergency is the easy bit. Declaring it is straightforward and feels good. Now we have to take action, which is harder. We have to begin making the really difficult decisions that will, together, help to shape a more environmentally conscious borough, and to make the kinds of behaviour change that will make a difference.

Ultimately we do need to reduce the number of car journeys. That doesn’t mean not using cars at all. Of course there are some people who will need to use cars more than others – in fact, promoting walking, cycling and public transport will actually make it easier, for example, for disabled people who depend on their vehicles to use the road, and to find places to park. There are many people who currently depend on the use of their car for work. But there are also huge numbers of unnecessary journeys. Just for example, there are a large number of very short car journeys made in our borough, and we need to reduce this number and to change how we move around. That’s not always going to be easy but it is going to be necessary.

Not about electric vehicles

This also absolutely is not about saying that everyone therefore needs to get an expensive electric car. Electric cars will continue to be free under these proposals, which I actually happen to think is not the right thing to do. There is still a cost to issuing permits to electric vehicles, which I think the owners of these vehicles should pay. And electric vehicles are not an environmental panacea: they still produce particulate pollution from their brakes and tyres, the production of these vehicles still has a huge carbon footprint, and the electricity they use has to be produced somewhere. Also, to really tackle climate change we will need to, as I was saying above, engage in some behaviour change, not just jump in an electric vehicle rather than a diesel one.  Electric vehicles represent part of the solution, but by no means a magical answer.

Going further

I know this won’t be popular, but I do also want to say that we could have gone further with out parking proposals. We could have, for example, limited the total number of vehicles allowed per household. We could have limited the total number of permits available.  We could have made the proposed charges higher! I know that the idea of charging at all seems shocking, but to my mind these aren’t, as the Newham Recorder and others have described them, ‘radical‘. Actually our proposals are pretty middle of the road (no pun intended) and normal.

In conclusion

I will press ‘publish’ on this post with a bit of trepidation. I already mentioned how strongly people feel about parking. When we introduced the residential parking zone across the ward I insisted on holding a residents’ drop-in meeting, and pushed this through despite resistance from various quarters and colleagues. I don’t think I’ve ever faced as much aggression and hostility as I did at that meeting (though interestingly, when I spoke to everyone there individually, it became obvious that the mood was being dominated by one or two very vocal people and overall views were much more mixed and nuanced). I don’t underestimate how strongly people will feel about this issue. But, at the risk of sounding grandiose, I became a councillor to make the world – ok, specifically Forest Gate – a better place. I didn’t become a councillor for personal glory. I want to do the right thing. I do honestly think that this is the right thing. I hope that you do too, but if you disagree with me, I hope you do at least understand my view.

The consultation on our proposed parking charges can be found online here:

Please do have your say.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Kuhn Way update

I’m not going to beat about the bush. The news is frustrating. Kuhn Way has to stay closed for (even) longer because the work on the school has over-run.

That’s the summary. Read on for more…

For some background, you might remember that there was a debate a while back about whether Kuhn Way (an alleyway that runs north-south basically from the station up towards Forest Street, Dimond Close, Essex Street, Norfolk Street, Suffolk Street, and the other streets that I have heard optimistic estate agents refer to as ‘the Lanes’.) Forest Gate Community School (FGCS) is a really fantastic, nationally acclaimed successful school, and is constrained as many urban schools are by small grounds that are effectively cut in two by Kuhn Way. With a bit of a heavy heart, I argued that although closing the access through Kuhn Way would enable the school to use their site better, actually this was an important route through for a large number of residents to get to the station, and it was really vital to keep it open. You can read about that in my blog post here  and again in this post here. 

So FGCS went back to the drawing board with their architects, and came up with a new plan, which I felt (and the planning committee felt) represented a real compromise which kept this alley open in the long term, but did involve closing it for a time whilst building works were done on the school’s walkways that run over the top. You can read my brief thoughts on the revised application at the top of my ward report here. (Stories that this blog is going to be renamed ‘Rachel’s ongoing ponderings on Kuhn Way’ have been greatly overstated…).

So it was with a bit of a heavy heart that I was informed, very politely by an officer keen to keep me in the loop, that in fact the works had over-run, and Kuhn Way would have to be kept closed for longer than we anticipated. I am really disappointed about this and I know local residents will be too. Actually the officer who told me wasn’t exactly delighted about it, and told me how she’d gone back to the contractors to ask whether it could be temporarily re-opened for a while, whether any work could be brought forward, and when I pressed about the delay and the duration I was assured she’d basically pursued all the avenues she could think of but that they just couldn’t find a way to make the delay any shorter.

The following newsletter has been sent out to local households. I did some redrafting of it as the first draft focussed more on the work and less on the outcome (longer closure) so I am happy that it’s as clear as it could be, which is at least something in terms of transparency. I also asked that the newsletter could be sent out to a larger area this time, so although it certainly won’t go to all of the roads that use Kuhn Way, it has gone through more residents’ doors this time which is again an improvement.

For what it’s worth, I am sorry about this. I use Kuhn Way myself, and so know that the diverted route is a bit of a pain, and obviously more so if you are disabled or elderly. I am glad that once the work on the school is finished we will be doing some improvements around it. I have seen an early draft of these and was keen that they should include planters, bollards to help stop pavement parking, a new sign marking Kuhn Way so that people know where it is, and more to help that area feel and be safer and better lit.

Which is all to say: Kuhn Way will reopen in September 2020. It will be improved and nicer and well-lit and safer. The closure is not brilliant, but I do believe that we all benefit as a community from having such a great school part of where we live, and so overall I do still think it’s worth it.

Edited 9/3/2020 to add an electronic version of the newsletter referred to above.


Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Bloomin’ Forest Gate

The next few weeks sees ‘Bloomin’ Forest Gate’ sweep across the ward to celebrate all that is green and lovely about where we live. Keep an eye out and you will see daffodils, planted by residents last year, growing and blooming in beds, tree pits, and any spare bit of earth we could find.

Please do take pictures of greenery and flowers and share using the hashtag you #bloominforestgate

We have a range of different activities and events going on, and you can see a full schedule online here:

Or download the brochure directly here: Bloomin’ Forest Gate

This work has come directly out of the Citizens’ Assembly where residents told us that they wanted more green, and more planting – which absolutely reflects my experience of speaking to residents who love where they live and know that more planting not only adds colour and beauty, but also encourages pollinators and biodiversity, helps cool streets, and improves drainage.

If you’d like to do more community planting then do drop me a line and I’d be happy to put you in touch with the group who are already planting as many spaces as they can find and doing a fabulous job making Forest Gate (even more) green and lovely.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Have your say about Health and Wellbeing in Newham

This info is from our public health team, who are consulting about our strategy for health and wellbeing. I know many Forest Gaters are very knowledgeable and interested in health, and wanted to flag these events so that you can get involved if you want to. There are three different consultation days, with ‘drop in’s during the day, and a Q and A in the evening. If you want to attend the Q and A, please book! Details are all below:

50 Steps to a healthier borough – we want to hear your voice!
The Borough’s Public Health Team has been working with partners and residents to develop a Health and Wellbeing Strategy.
We want to call it 50 Steps to a Healthier Borough and we want it to be owned by everyone – residents, employers, health organisations and voluntary organisations etc.

There are 3 events available for residents to give us your views as we want to ensure the 50 Steps work well for everyone.
It’s definitely not too late for us to make changes and amendments.

Each event will last a day – starting at 11.00am with an exhibition board and staff on hand to talk informally with residents visiting the library throughout the day followed by a questions and answer session from 6.00pm to 7.45pm in the evening with key player’s including Jason Strelitz the Director of Public Health and a prominent local GP.

Monday 2 March  Beckton Library
Tuesday 3 March Manor Park Library
Wednesday 11 March  Plaistow Library

You can visit to book a place for the evening session of your choice.
Any queries – please contact

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Rachel’s February 2020 ward report

Hello and welcome to my ward report. I write these specifically in order to report back to the Labour members of Forest Gate North, who selected me to be one of their councillor candidates. But in the interests of transparency I also publish them on my councillor blog, where anyone from the ward or even beyond can have a read. I hope it’s a useful and informative insight into some of the work involved in being a ward councillor, and as ever if you read this and have any questions please do contact me.

Healthy school street


This is the biggest piece of work I’ve been involved in recently: the timed closures of streets around Woodgrange Infants and Godwin Junior schools in order to encourage active travel, improve road safety, improve air quality, and make the journey to school more pleasant. I have been really moved by the huge support that this scheme has attracted, with good responses from local residents, parents, teachers, groups like Newham Cyclists, and more.
The implementation of this scheme I would say has been broadly ok but not perfect, and you can read my thoughts after the first day here:

My main source of frustration, in common with the schools and with other supporters, is that installing the cameras has taken much longer than any of us wanted. However, as I write this on the 6th February, the cameras have been installed and are working, and warning letters are being prepared and will be sent out this week. After an initial warning period, fines will be issued, and I am hopeful that fines will be very successful in changing behaviour as we have seen thus far that road signs, bollards, and even people physically speaking to motorists is no guarantee that they won’t ignore it and just drive through anyway!

I am aware that there may be some feedback about the scheme once fines start to be issued, and wanted to be clear that I plan to stand firm if this happens because of the importance of the scheme, and the results we are already achieving.


There are a few niggling issues to iron out: I have a detailed question about residents of one of the roads and visitors’ permits, and we also have some persistently fast driving from vehicles including Newham rubbish lorries, and various cars with disabled badges. But overall, the situation outside the schools, especially outside Woodgrange in the mornings, has already changed enormously for the better.

What I really hoped by working so hard on this scheme, was not just to get a better school run for me and my daughters (though I’ll be honest, that’s a lovely side benefit!) but was to make a big impact that would help more of these types of schemes happen across the borough. So I’m particularly delighted to have been contacted by a few people who are interested in how something similar can happen in their local schools. Newham already has a programme planned of other school streets going forwards, and I’m hoping to complement this by being a kind of unofficial advocate for the schemes. If you’re reading this and are interested, this article is a great place to start:

Liveable Neighbourhood bid and Odessa Rd traffic calming

I’ve blogged recently about a traffic calming scheme that we are working on for Odessa Road in conjunction with Waltham Forest:
I know that some respondents to the consultation, like Newham Cyclists, would like us to be more ambitious and to ‘filter’ the road (which means having no through traffic except bicycles and pedestrians – the simplest way of doing this is to have a bollard, say, half-way down so that people can access Odessa Road homes and shops by car if they absolutely need to, but they can’t use it as a cut-through).  I am very much in favour of modal filters, and would like eventually to see many many more of them across Forest Gate to stop through traffic on our residential streets.

Regarding this scheme specifically, I’ve had a chat with Highways, and the intention is to use the responses to the various consultations we’ve already done as part of our funding bid, to get some work done on this important road within the bid area, and also to show TfL that we can work with Waltham Forest, and I think it’s also about ‘showing willing’ too. I have my fingers very tightly crossed that if we resubmit our bid for this Liveable Neighbourhood, we might be successful, and if so that would be a really very exciting project that could make a huge difference to the ward, and you’ll certainly be hearing a lot more about it from me.

Canteen opening

The story of how exactly I became tangentially involved in ‘food’ at Newham is a long one, but had a delightful outcome this week as I was invited to the launch of the new canteen at Newham’s Dockside office. For years the food there has been outsourced and provided by a large company whose offer was broadly fine, but uninspiring and quite depressing if you were eating there most days as I was for a while. On Monday the place was taken over by Juniper Ventures, the Council’s catering and cleaning service. Bringing this in-house means the staff are now all on the London Living Wage, and our commitment to community wealth building and the environment has led to a whole host of really lovely improvements: a great range of vegan and vegetarian food, sugar smart snacks, the provision of tap water to drink, and much more. I felt for the first time that this canteen, which serves hundreds of Newham employees every day, was telling a very coherent story about the kind of organisation we want to be, and the kind of borough we want to create, and seeing that come to fruition was great, not to mention delicious.

Railway arches

I’ve had some ongoing casework for the past few months about railway arches on Bignold and Strode Roads. These arches have been occupied by squatters, which as one resident pointed out, is not necessarily problematic in itself. What is a problem is that the arches seem to be used at the weekend for informal ‘club nights’ with music and even security, which is causing a significant disturbance to local residents. These are local people who have previously been disturbed by tenants of the arches who ran various car businesses that were best described as ‘somewhat unneighbourly’, so I am especially struck by their having to endure even more disruption.

The arches are owned by Network Rail, so I have been co-ordinating and sharing information between the various people involved to see whether we can support each other to take any necessary action. Our Council enforcement officers have paid a visit, and Licensing are planning to attend. I have been in touch with our great Safer Neighbourhoods Police team, as residents are concerned that some recent crimes may be linked to night time activity there, and I’ve also been in touch with our noise nuisance service. As with many of these kinds of issues, the way to approach them is to think about what the possible legal ways ‘in’ are by which we might be able to, want to, or indeed just be able to justify the use of public money in taking action. In this case I’ve also been in regular touch with the Arches Company who are collating evidence in order to take some legal action to evict the people there. I’ll also liaise with our homelessness officers if and when eviction does happen, to see that we are offering support if the people there need it.

Maryland community group

Last week saw the most recent meeting of the Maryland Community Group, which has now been going strong for several years. We had a very well-attended and helpful meeting, with a wide-ranging agenda including Maryland shop fronts maintenance, fly tipping in Council car parks, and more.

As a result of this, together with Nareser Osei who is one of the councillors from Stratford and Newtown, we are looking into several issues including the car parks, pedestrians at Water Lane, parking and the pavements outside St. Francis School, and more.

The Maryland group are currently fund raising and will split the money raised between Lola’s Homeless, and use the rest for a community planter that will form part of the new public realm outside the station. If you would like to get involved in this, do join the Facebook group ‘Maryland Community Group’ or you can donate to the fundraiser here:

I particularly wanted to highlight a recent success of the group, who got organised to oppose the ‘downgrading’ of a local development. In a nutshell, a small development got planning permission, but was not built to the same standards as were agreed. They then applied for retrospective planning permit, seeking to get the cheaper changes they’d made signed off. The Maryland group are particularly interested in planning, and high quality building on the main road, and drafted a template response objecting to this application. We just heard that this application has been rejected, so the developer will have to do what they should have done to begin with: to build the development to the specifications agreed when they applied. (I’ll write a bit more about residents’ participation in planning decisions and how I’m hoping to encourage more of it below but this kind of thing is so important, where residents can make a real difference.)

Boundary review

Speaking of Maryland, the Boundary Review Commission consultation on their proposed new wards, including a new ‘Maryland’ ward is closing later this month. Anyone who wants to respond to the proposed new ward boundaries can do so here:

The consultation closes on the 17th February.

Bloomin’ Forest Gate

I’ve always been really passionate about greening and planting as a way to improve our local area, promote wildlife including bees, and to bring people together, so I’m really pleased to be helping with a project called ‘Bloomin’ Forest Gate’ which has grown out of the Forest Gate Citizens’ Assemblies. It will take place in March and will be a celebration of the planting and green we already have, a chance to learn more about what we can all do to increase the flowers and trees here, and should create more planting for us all to enjoy in the future. Daffodil bulbs were available from the library last year, and have been planted all over Forest Gate (I have spotted some of them starting to come up) so keep an eye out for those, and for the programme of events which will be published soon.

Forest Gate Community School

Our local outstanding secondary school is nearing the end of the works to expand it, which should mean that Kuhn Way is re-opened soon (I need to check exactly when!). As local councillors, Sasha Anam and I were contacted about some potential improvements to the road and pavement outside the school. I have had contact with several residents about this area, and how it could be improved, and have suggested to highways that it would be great to have: a ‘heritage’ style sign showing ‘Kuhn Way, previously known as Parliament Place’, bollards and planters to physically prevent pavement parking, some enforcement work to check that the commercial bins are properly maintained and locked, dropped kerbs for bicycle and cargo bike access, as well as good lighting and CCTV in Kuhn Way now that it will be partially ‘under cover’ (you can read about the final planning decision at the top of a previous ward report here:

I don’t know how much of the above we’ll be able to get, but am quite optimistic about the bollards and planters, as I know that pavement parking is a real problem here. I’d love to see us install some visitor cycle parking for the school too. So watch this space!

Little Shops

I enjoyed going to the Gate for the launch of a project called ‘Little Shops’ which local artist Rayna Nadeem created, supported by funds through Newham and Crossrail. This is a look at some of the small businesses that make up our high street, including audio files and 360 degree photos. I was particularly pleased to go as Rayna had experienced a problem with getting the project online, and I was able to unblock this for her so that it could eventually be published. To see the project, take a look here: and click on ‘Little Shops’.

Casework success

I don’t report here on detailed casework for reasons of confidentiality, but I have been really pleased recently to have some success in some casework. Sometimes success feels few and far between, not just because of the impact of austerity which severely limits what we’re able to do as an authority, but also because sometimes when things get better the people who have complained to me (understandably) go away and carry on with their lives. So I’m always particularly appreciative when people get back to me and let me know that a solution has been found after I’ve intervened.

I had a very troubling housing case resolved (as I said on twitter, if not ‘ideally’ then certainly ‘satisfactorily’). I’m also told that an ongoing problem of ASB, crime and litter is due to be solved after some joint work which I helped with the housing association, residents and the local police. Some work on the wall, gates and a change to the layout are anticipated to be really helpful here, which is also great to hear. Also you might have noticed the ongoing issue of water pouring out of a flat on Sebert Road, across the pavement and into the road where the market storage is. After some really prompt and helpful work by the private sector licensing team, this leak has stopped (a small pause in typing here to hope that it doesn’t now start again!!), and action has been taken to make sure that the landlord is not renting out accommodation that is substandard. Elsewhere, I contacted the same team about safety concerns in a flat that have now been rectified.
There is always more to do! And I’m constantly plagued by guilt about the amount of ongoing casework I have, which often feels and perhaps is unmanageable. But I always do my best to do whatever I can, fairly, so that residents are treated properly, and it’s very rewarding on the occasions when I know I’ve made a difference.

Forest Gate high street

Although the main part of Woodgrange Road is in Forest Gate South, I do take an active interest in the whole high street, as these are our shops too, and I know the whole of the high street is important to residents.

I am assured that work on the empty run of shops from 39 – 49 Woodgrange Road should begin soon. I have been so disappointed to see these shops empty for so long, and I know residents have too. The developer who originally got planning permission for this site spoke about their commitment to the local area and wanting to contribute to Forest Gate, but since these fine words have sold it on, one presumes at a profit with the planning permission existing. I remain hopeful that when this work is done, the flats are occupied and the shops have tenants, that it will be a positive contribution to our high street. But I have also emailed planning letting them know that in light of other developments in the pipeline (like the Methodist church, and perhaps in future Durning Hall) this one will ‘set a standard’ and that I hope we can keep a close eye on the construction, build quality, and materials to make sure that the conditions we placed on the original permission aren’t deviated from.

I have been temporarily thwarted in my desire to hold a residents’ planning meeting, first by the pre-election period and then by some initial preparation within planning for a larger piece of work on resident engagement. I can only say that I am still hoping to hold a meeting, open to any interested residents, at the library, where you can come along, meet some planners, hear a presentation about the process and the legislation, and ask questions. I will keep trying to make this happen!

Democracy Commission

As a quick sign-off I wanted to particularly flag the work of the Democracy Commission, which is looking at democracy in Newham and will be making recommendations about how we should work to involve and represent residents. Labour members will know that our directly elected Executive Mayoral model has been the subject of some debate, and Rokhsana Fiaz was elected on a promise of holding a referendum to determine whether this model should continue. The Democracy Commission is working as a preparation to this, looking at different models both of governance and participation, and will be making recommendations that should lead to the referendum. There have been a series of public meetings, and you can still contribute your thoughts and ideas to their work online. Their website is here:

I won’t make the obvious parallel, but will say that recent years have shown us that any question asked in a referendum should be very carefully considered and researched before rather than after the vote! I would be disappointed to see us leaping straight to a question like ‘should we have an Executive Mayor? Yes/ no’ and am glad to see an independent commission looking at evidence to consider what might be useful ways forward, and doing proper research so that whatever the answer from the referendum is, we all know we’ve been kept fully informed, and that there is proper planning, consideration and resourcing for the option we choose.

I traditionally end my reports by apologising for the length of them, so perhaps I should stop doing that and just ‘fess up that I do write long councillor reports, that’s just what I do! But I hope that despite being long, they are at least a good way of remaining accountable, and that some parts of them are even quite interesting to people who wonder what on earth councillors get up to.

I am contactable via email : and although I’m not nearly as fast at getting back to people as I’d like, I will respond to you if you email me. I’m here for any complaints and difficulties, of course, but also always particularly happy to hear from people who have ideas, who want to help do something, and to make a difference.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Working with Waltham Forest on Odessa Road

Some readers will already know that at Newham we have submitted a ‘Liveable Neighbourhoods’ bid to the Greater London Authority to create a cross-borough Liveable Neighbourhood which covers part of Forest Gate North ward, part of Cann Hall ward in Waltham Forest, and part of Stratford and Newtown ward. You can read about our initial bid on this Newham webpage here. 

In brief though, a ‘liveable neighbourhood’ is the new name for a project that was initially termed ‘Mini Holland’. Not, as the first name suggests, only about cycling, the idea is that funding is available to work with local people to create a big impact over a defined area to make it a better, cleaner, and more pleasant place to walk and cycle, thereby encouraging more active travel and use of public transport, and reducing the number of car journeys. Waltham Forest has led the way in this work, using GLA funds and their own cash for far-reaching public realm projects which have delivered frankly astonishing results in terms of improvements in air quality, and even seen them, I believe, be the only London borough to see its residents walking more than before.

If we are going to address our poor air quality and do our bit to help slow down climate change, we are going to have to make some changes. Thankfully some of these changes, like this project, will also have other benefits, including increasing activity levels, improving mental health, making an area more attractive, and even potentially improving community cohesion and local relationships.

So it might sound negative to report that our joint bid to the GLA wasn’t in fact successful. But we did win funding elsewhere, for a Liveable Neighbourhood in Custom House, and our joint bid with our WF friends and colleagues received very positive feedback, and we were urged to resubmit. As part of that, we ran the consultation process again, and got even more ideas from residents about how we can improve the area that forms the bid. We are very lucky to have Walthamd Forest as our neighbours, so we can see at first hand how they have made their improvements, benefit from their experience and expertise (and some of the things they’ve learnt, which they are very open about) , and also take advantage of our shared boundary bring some of their healthy streets approach gradually down south into Newham, to a group of residents who will already be using the public spaces in Waltham Forest, and will have seen the changes and benefits first hand.

Now, regardless of the funding that may or may not come centrally, we are working with Waltham Forest on Odessa Road, a road that crosses the borough boundary, also crosses the Quietway that runs through the ward, and has two schools on or near it.

If you live within the consultation area, you will receive a leaflet and information about the proposals, all of which I’ve linked below. There is also a drop in session on the 23rd January, from 1 – 4pm, in what is rather intriguingly termed ‘our mobile engagement unit’ which will be on Odessa Road near the junction with Dean Street. (I will be there, and will report back on what this actually is!) Apologies if this daytime session isn’t convenient – I did ask but it’s not possible due to officer commitments to hold an evening session this time. You can however give your comments, thoughts and ideas, and indeed ask any questions you have by emailing (or

The proposals are detailed on the leaflets but include a 20mph speed limit, new speed bumps (and replacing those that are there), planting, and other traffic calming. I am really pleased and excited to see this work happening in my ward, and am very much in favour of all of this work.

If you’d like to respond to this stage of the consultation (which is itself building on the previous two consultations as part of our Liveable Neighbourhood bid) then I would encourage you to do so.

Letter about scheme

Leaflet 1

Leaflet 2



Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment